Move of Bishop Müller tohead CDF in Rome «catastrophic»
Theologe Küng: Beförderung von Bischof Müller «katastrophal» - Stuttgart - Bild.de
The appointment of Regensburg Bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller to Rome from the perspective of the Catholic theologian Hans Küng is a "disastrous miscasting." "As prefect of the CDF, this narrow-minded agitator is out of place," Kung said on Monday in Tübingen to the news agency dpa. Those who believe a contemporary proclamation of the Christian message to be opportune, could despair of such a decision, he said further.
Cathcon- I can sense that I may be able to find common ground with alte Hans although for widely divergent reasons. Although the accusation of being an agitator coming from his lips has a certain irony.
The appointment of Regensburg Bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller to Rome from the perspective of the Catholic theologian Hans Küng is a "disastrous miscasting." "As prefect of the CDF, this narrow-minded agitator is out of place," Kung said on Monday in Tübingen to the news agency dpa. Those who believe a contemporary proclamation of the Christian message to be opportune, could despair of such a decision, he said further.
Cathcon- I can sense that I may be able to find common ground with alte Hans although for widely divergent reasons. Although the accusation of being an agitator coming from his lips has a certain irony.
.jpeg)
Comments
CDF THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF VATICAN COUNCIL II - YOURS IS THE FALSE ONE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/cdf-there-are-two-intrpretations-of.html#links
They Vatican is supported by the Jewish Left media but they have no citations for their ‘ecclesiology of communion’, ‘theology of religions’ and ‘non Catholics do not have to convert for salvation’.
The SSPX –Vatican (Ladaria-Morerod) talks were kept secret. This helped the Vatican which has no citations from the Council for their new theories and obligations.
1.Eclesiology of communion :Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.Since LG 8 and LG 16 are not explicit they do not contradict AG 7. The Curia cannot cite LG 8 or LG 16 as exceptions. They have no citations from Vatican Council II for their ecclesiology of communion.
One cannot just refer to ‘the spirit of Vatican Council II’ which could mean anything to different Catholics. It could also be used to justify sin.
2.Theology of religions:As mentioned above Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water. Since LG 8 and LG 16 are not explicit they do not contradict AG 7.Neither do we know who is saved with the seeds of the Word and imperfect communion with the Church.
AG 7 is in accord with the literal interpetation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there are no known exceptions.
Cardinals Ladaria and Koch cannot cite any exceptions from the Council.
3. Jews do not have to convert in the present time :There is no text in Vatican Council II to support this un-biblical theory. This new political view is contradicted by AG 7, the Bible (John 3:5,Mk.16:16), the dogma on salvation etc.
4.Jews are the Chosen People of God : The Bible says Jews need to convert and there is a New Covenant. Nostra Aetate 4,Vatican Council II says Catholics 'are the new people of God'.-Lionel Andrades
Archbishop Augustine Di Noia does the Holy Spirit teach that LG 8 and LG 16 are known to us and not implicit?
The new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is quoted as saying that the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) needs to accept Vatican Council II.
The SSPX has accepted Vatican Council II. They have signed the doctrinal preamble and as promised they should be given canonical status.
It should not be said that the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council. It has been reported and is well known now that the Superior General of the SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay signed the doctrinal preamble which was accepted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
If the SSPX is not being given canonical status it is not because of Vatican Council II.
There were new conditions that the SSPX had to accept it was reported. They are with reference (1) to the Jews and (2) the theology of the liberal version of Vatican Council II.
So it should be clearly said in public that the SSPX is not being accepted into the Church even though they accepted Vatican Council II according to Tradition but because of two other reasons.
1) They are not being accepted because of the demands from the Jewish Left e.g Jews do not have to convert, or that Catholics are not the Chosen People of God and there will be no mission to the Jews.
2) They have to accept theological conditions based on an explicit LG 8 and LG 16. They will have to assume that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicit and visible to us and so contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus..So the result is that now there is a theology of religions and an ecclesiology of communion.
The Vice President of Ecclesia Dei Archbishop Augustine di Noia has told La Stampa that the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit and does not make errors.Explicit LG 16 and LG 8 is an error being thrust upon the SSPX.
-Lionel Andrades