Bishop Fellay summoned to the Vatican
Mgr Fellay pourrait être réintégré dans l'Eglise catholique - rts.ch - info - monde
Bishop Fellay could be reinstated in the Catholic Church
The superior of the ultra-conservative SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, could be reinstated in the Catholic Church. Benedict XVI summoned him on Wednesday to the Vatican.
The superior of the ultra-conservative SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, was summoned to the Vatican on Wednesday and will receive an answer from Benedict XVI on his reinstatement in the Church, the news agency, Vatican I. media has learned.
The Pope's decision, whether positive or negative, is not likely to be communicated before Bishop Fellay has had a chance to study it and give his response. This may cause a delay before the decision of Benedict XVI is actually known.
Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (d. 1991) and separated from Rome since 1988, the SSPX, who objected strenuously to the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), has many priests (about 500), hundreds of seminarians, nuns and tens of thousands of faithful.
Benedict XVI's gesture
The pope had made a first move towards granting liberty for the Lefebvrists (Cathcon not a term I would use) in 2007 to use of liturgical books in Latin before the Council. Then he lifted the excommunication of four bishops of the Society, including that of British revisionist bishop Richard Williamson. Finally, he accepted the opening of doctrinal discussions.
Mid-May, the Vatican has stressed that the positions of three other bishops fundamentalists, Mgrs of Alfonso Galarreta, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais and Richard Williamson, more "ultra" that Bishop Fellay would be "treated as separate and unique".
Bishop Fellay could be reinstated in the Catholic Church
The superior of the ultra-conservative SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, could be reinstated in the Catholic Church. Benedict XVI summoned him on Wednesday to the Vatican.
The superior of the ultra-conservative SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, was summoned to the Vatican on Wednesday and will receive an answer from Benedict XVI on his reinstatement in the Church, the news agency, Vatican I. media has learned.
The Pope's decision, whether positive or negative, is not likely to be communicated before Bishop Fellay has had a chance to study it and give his response. This may cause a delay before the decision of Benedict XVI is actually known.
Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (d. 1991) and separated from Rome since 1988, the SSPX, who objected strenuously to the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), has many priests (about 500), hundreds of seminarians, nuns and tens of thousands of faithful.
Benedict XVI's gesture
The pope had made a first move towards granting liberty for the Lefebvrists (Cathcon not a term I would use) in 2007 to use of liturgical books in Latin before the Council. Then he lifted the excommunication of four bishops of the Society, including that of British revisionist bishop Richard Williamson. Finally, he accepted the opening of doctrinal discussions.
Mid-May, the Vatican has stressed that the positions of three other bishops fundamentalists, Mgrs of Alfonso Galarreta, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais and Richard Williamson, more "ultra" that Bishop Fellay would be "treated as separate and unique".
.jpeg)
Comments
Will the SSPX accept Bishop Di Noia and the Curia's condition that non Catholics do not have to convert in the present time
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/canon-law-915-also-applies-to-cardinal.html#links
CANON 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/canon-915-also-applies-to-cardinal.html#links
Cardinal Donald Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington, USA dismissed a priest who appealed to Cardinal Raymond Burke, Prefect, Supreme Tribunal, Vatican.Cardinal Burke supported the priest but Archbishop Wuerl refused to take him back in the diocese.The priest said he had the satisfaction of the decision of the Supreme Tribunal.
Cardinal Burke decides so many cases and Catholics seek justice at his office. He is respected for his honesty and integrity and traditional Catholic values.
Now it is Cardinal Burke who is not affirming the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the Cardinal Richard Cushing error. This is the error of being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire- and these cases are supposed to be exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
So along with traditionalist priests he assumes that those saved in invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) are exceptions to the defined dogma which says all need to convert into the Church for salvation.With this irrational and heretical position he offers the Traditional Latin Mass.
Instead of affirming the faith and correcting the priests who offer the Pontifical Latin Mass with him he permits the heresy to go unchecked.This is an impediment for those who offer the Latin Mass including the Pontifical Latin Mass.
We do not know anyone saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. So there are no exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.Vatican Council II (AG 7) is in accord with the dogma and the Syllabus of Errors .
The cardinal is also silent while there is a public campaign to get theSociety of St.Pius X ( SSPX), to accept Vatican Council II as a break from the dogma and the Syllabus of Errors. They are being threatened,and are being forced to accept heresy or face an' ecclesial rupture'. The cardinal remains silent.
Where is the text in Vatican Council II which says we know Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire? None.
Yet the SSPX has to mouth heresy like Cardinal Kurt Koch and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia and Cardinal Burke is silent.
How can a religious offer Mass according to Canon Law who is in public mortal sin?
The SSPX should ask Cardinal Raymond Burke to publicly comment on this issue . The leftist newspapers and journalists will not ask him these questions.
continued
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/cardinal-raymond-burke-party-to-heresy.html#links
QUESTIONS FOR CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE
1.Do we know any one saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire?
2.So are invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says every one needs to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation?
3.'God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257). Do we know any such case? Someone who is saved without the Sacraments is known to us ? Can this case be an exception to the dogma? Does the Catechism contradict the dogma here?
4.Those who know about Jesus and the Church need to convert to avoid Hell and those who do not know can be saved (LG 14).Can we say that any particular person known to us will be saved ? Can we say that anyone personally known to us 'who does not know' is saved or will be saved? Is this not known only to God?
So does LG 14,Vatican Council II contradict the dogma?
5.We do not know anyone saved with the 'seeds of the Word', imperfect communion with the church, 'elements of sanctification'(LG 8),being 'good and holy'(NA), a good conscience and invincible ignorance (LG 16).So these cases do not contradict the dogma? Vatican Council II here does not contradict the dogma?
6.Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
7.All those who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church (CCC 846) does not contradict everyone needs to enter the Church 'as through a door' ?(CCC 846,AG 7). So it also does not contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Does the Catechism contradict the dogma here?
8.Ad Gentes 7(all need faith and baptism) does not contradict Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance/ good conscience)? Does Vatican Council II contradict itself here?
9.AG 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and also, there can be those saved in invincible ignorance etc. Does AG 7 contradict itself?
-Lionel Andrades
CANON LAW 915 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/canon-law-915.html#links
ASK YOUR PARISH PRIEST FOR MORE INFORMATION ON AD GENTES 7, VATICAN COUNCIL II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/ask-your-parish-priest-for-more.html#links
IMPEDIMENT IN THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/impediment-in-traditional-latin-mass.html#links
The pope and his Curia have made an objective mistake and are now forcing it upon the SSPX with threats of an ecclesial rupture.
“If it is desirable to offer a diagnosis of the text [Gaudium et Spes] as a whole, we might say that (in conjunction with the texts on religious liberty and world religions) it is a revision of the Syllabus of Pius IX, a kind of countersyllabus. [...] Let us be content to say that the text serves as a countersyllabus and, as such, represents, on the part of the Church, an attempt at an official reconciliation with the new era inaugurated in 1789.”-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Principles of Catholic Theology, 1987, pp. 381-2, Ignatius Press 1987)
http://www.romancatholicism.org/vatican-ii.htm
I altered the text in such a way as to express our faith that Christ is the Savior for all, that there are not two channels of salvation, so that Christ is also the redeemer of the Jews, and not just of the Gentiles.
But the new formulation also shifts the focus from a direct petition for the conversion of the Jews in a missionary sense...-Light of the World-Conversations with Peter Seewald (Ignatius Press.p.107)
For Pope Benedict XVI there is salvation outside the Church since he assumes that those saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.From here the problems start for all of us.
continued
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/pope-benedict-xvi-makes-richard-cushing.html#links