- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular Posts
Erotic Church Service- More Sex for the Vicar
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Bishop resigns after clashing with his diocese over Latin Mass
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
World's youngest Cardinal equates faithful homosexual and heterosexual relations
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Cardinal Martini speaks to the Church from beyond the grave- full text
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Top German paediatrician finds outcome of Alfie Evans case completely incomprehensible
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Francis wants to erase all trace of Pope Benedict. The Damnatio Memoriae continues.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Elise B.
The parallel canon in the CCEO 671.4 has the identical content. However, the question does remain: would would a weekday, non-festive Divine Liturgy (2 June 2006), constitute a "grave neccesity" urging a prominent Anglican's theologian's public reception of the Eucharist from the hand of a Catholic Bishop?
Are there any canonists reading that could shed some light on this?
In this case, in fact, there is no objective grave spiritual need for the eternal salvation of Milbank to receive the Eucharist from a Uniate Bishop at a weekday Divine Liturgy during a ecumenical conference! (cf. 45, Ecclesia de Eucharistia).
For all you RCs who love quoting Vatican II: "Divine law forbids any common worship which would damage the unity of the Church, or involve formal acceptance of falsehood or the danger of deviation in the faith, of scandal, or of indifferentism” (Decree on the Eastern Catholic Churches, 26). Orientalium Ecclesiarum, 26.
It is the same dear Bishop introducing Milbank to the conference prior to the Divine Liturgy.