Talk about abuses. However, it is legit, apart from what the priest is wearing (which is a mere technicality) Can. 924 §1. The most holy eucharistic sacrifice must be offered with bread and with wine in which a little water must be mixed.
§2. The bread must be only wheat and recently made so that there is no danger of spoiling.
§3. The wine must be natural from the fruit of the vine and not spoiled.
Which they are
Can. 932 §1. The eucharistic celebration is to be carried out in a sacred place unless in a particular case necessity requires otherwise; in such a case the celebration must be done in a decent place.
§2. The Eucharistic sacrifice must be carried out on a dedicated or blessed altar; outside a sacred place a suitable table can be used, always with a cloth and a corporal.
Which is in this picture, though outside, it is still on a table, with a corporal and the works.
This one I really have to grit my teeth on, because this is clearly liturgical abuse, someone really needs to call the bishop on this one. It's a hard one to call, because technically (apart from the vestments) nothing is wrong, but you can just tell. Please someone give me proof on how this is wrong, because I can't seem to find it, and have it be something legal, from the Vatican.
.jpeg)
Comments
Can. 924 §1. The most holy eucharistic sacrifice must be offered with bread and with wine in which a little water must be mixed.
§2. The bread must be only wheat and recently made so that there is no danger of spoiling.
§3. The wine must be natural from the fruit of the vine and not spoiled.
Which they are
Can. 932 §1. The eucharistic celebration is to be carried out in a sacred place unless in a particular case necessity requires otherwise; in such a case the celebration must be done in a decent place.
§2. The Eucharistic sacrifice must be carried out on a dedicated or blessed altar; outside a sacred place a suitable table can be used, always with a cloth and a corporal.
Which is in this picture, though outside, it is still on a table, with a corporal and the works.
This one I really have to grit my teeth on, because this is clearly liturgical abuse, someone really needs to call the bishop on this one. It's a hard one to call, because technically (apart from the vestments) nothing is wrong, but you can just tell. Please someone give me proof on how this is wrong, because I can't seem to find it, and have it be something legal, from the Vatican.