Protestants call on Pope to unreservedly accept Vatican II

Vatikan: Kritik an Papst Benedikt reisst nicht ab - Bild.de

In Mannheim, a church has set up a hotline for distressed Catholics to express their anger.

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) has expressed its concern about the future of ecumenism. While the denial of the Holocaust by Williamson one should not trivialise, it is "by far not the only problem we have in this context in mind," said President of the EKD Bishop Wolfgang Huber to Bavarian Radio.

Everyone knew that the SSPX even more radically deny the Second Vatican Council and the "ecclesiastical nature" of all other Christian churches than has been the case in recent Papal utterances, said Huber. In the recent decree of the Vatican, a change in this attitude was not required.



The Braunschweig Regional Bishop Friedrich Weber in the ARD-Morgenmagazin was critical of the fact that the Pope in the General Audience on Wednesday did not use the occasion to personally comment on Holocaust denial. "That would have been a clear signal that the Pope stands by the results of the Second Vatican Council."

Cathcon calls on all Protestants to recognise immediately wholly and without reservation the decrees Vatican II at least, as well as Trent and Vatican I. If they don’t accept them themselves, how can they criticise other people for not accepting them?

Comments

T.R. Peacocke said…
"Vatican II" for the Protesants means that Catholic priests won't accept Protestants into the Catholic Church--because it's all the same, you know. I remember reaing the testimony of a Swedish SSPX-er who had been refused acceptance into the CHurch by a Swedish Bishop, because, according to him, conversion of Protestants is no longer necessary after VII.

I wonder whether the Catholic prelates in Europe are up in arms because they are afraid that the SSPX might attract people away from their "Spirit of Vatican II" parishes, thereby minishing their already dwindling attendance.
Dolorosa said…
Everybody wants to tell the Pope how to run the Catholic Church. This false ecumenism and interfaith meetings have contributed to this problem! I pray for the day when "Vatican II" is no more and catholics will unite in the one true faith once again.
The_Editrix said…
And now imagine the reactions to a pope telling the Protestants how to run THEIR church.
P.J.David said…
Let the Bishops and Cardinals truely understand and accept the damages the catholic church suffers from the so called Ecumenism,liberalism(Marxism).The churches are empty, lost so many priests ,vocations lost that seminaries are being closed. You are selling the churches as you have no priests, Catholic schools and convents are being closed. Atlast criticising the Holy Father.
Do you have the Catholic faith left within yourselves.Holy Sacrifice of Mass,Sacraments and catechism are corrupted.You finally criticise the Holy Father !
Remmeber that one day you have to come before the Judgement seat of God,the Creator. Do you all believe in the Fatima message ?
Very sad .
Lagenda said…
I was one of the many religious who left their monasteries, convents and religious houses in the confusion brought about in the wake of Vatican II. I was one year from making my final vows when our community life was turned upside down by all the nonsense foisted upon us in the name of liberty of spirit. I saw our daily community life and exercises turned into options rather than obligations. The members started doing their own thing instead of being present at the common exercises like morning and evening meditation. Community life as I has known it and been happy with for six year fell apart.
Laxity was the order of the day, and the timing of the evening meal was set according to what was good on the television. Community night prayers went out of the window and the only priest present at morning meditation with three of four lay brothers was the one saying the 7am Mass. Faced with this, I did not feel that I could in all conscience go forward to final vows. I did the right thing because had I stayed I would have had a major problem accepting the Novus Ordo Missae and all the excesses and abuses that went on in the name of experimental liturgy and ecumenism. On the day that I should have renewed my vows prior to final vows one year later, I left my monastery in the dark at 6am in a flood of tears. I didn’t want to go, but under the circumstances I could not stay. Looking around the UK now at the number of religious houses and seminaries that are either closed, communities moved to smaller premises, or just hanging on with a few elderly members, I remain unconvinced that Vatican II was the great success and renewal that we are constantly told it was. By their fruits shall you know them, and since Vatican II there has been a crop failure and a blight of religious vocations. Quite the contrary happened after the Council of Trent when there was an astonishing revival of priestly and religious vocations, reforms in relaxed religious communities, and a plethora or new religious orders and congregations. Trent produced a visible and palpable revival in the church the likes of which we are still waiting to see in the wake of Vatican II.
gramps said…
How about we get the bishops and priest to all sign on that they will follow the actual teaching of the church, the Cathecism, Canon Law, and tradition as well as the actual documents of Vatican II and not the spirit of Vatican II. How about those who dissent decide to finally leave and take their faith to the protestant religion where it belongs.