Head of Polish Bishops slams Synodal Path
From 2022
"In view of the communion of faith and history between Poland and Germany, I would like to express my deep concern about the information that has recently been heard from certain circles of the Catholic Church in Germany," wrote the President of the Polish Episcopal Conference, Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki, in a letter to the President of the German Episcopal Conference, Bishop Georg Bätzing, in relation to the German "Synodal Way".
Chairman of the Polish Episcopate
acknowledged that the Catholic Church in Germany plays an important role in
Europe. "That is why I view the
actions of the German "Synodal Way" so far with concern. Looking at its fruits, one can get the
impression that the basis of reflection is not always the Gospel," Gądecki
wrote.
Archbishop Gądecki stressed that, true to the
Church's teaching, we must not give in to the pressures of the world or the
models of the prevailing culture, as this can lead to moral and spiritual
corruption. "Let us avoid repeating
hackneyed slogans and standard demands such as the abolition of celibacy, the
priesthood of women, communion for remarried divorcees or the blessing of
same-sex partnerships," he appealed.
Despite outrage, ostracism and unpopularity,
the Catholic Church, faithful to the truth of the Gospel and at the same time
driven by love for every human being, cannot remain silent and agree with this
false image of humanity, let alone bless or promote it, said the President of
the Polish Episcopate.
The current crisis of the Church in Europe is
above all a crisis of faith . The crisis of faith is one of the reasons why the
Church has difficulties in proclaiming clear theological and moral teaching,
Gadecki wrote. The authority of the Pope
and the Bishops is most needed when the Church is going through a difficult
time and when it is under pressure to deviate from the teachings of Jesus.
In his letter, Archbishop Gądecki referred to
the documents of the Catholic Church, the teaching of Pope Francis, John Paul
II and Paul VI, and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
We publish the full text of the letter:
Dear Bishop George,
The Catholic Church in Germany and the Catholic Church in Poland
are bound together by more than a thousand years of common history. This history grows out of the deposit of the
apostolic faith in Jesus Christ, which, placed in the hands of St Peter, was
passed on to the successors of the apostles - the Bishops - who lead, teach and
sanctify the individual local churches. "But
I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the
gates of the netherworld will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of
heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you
loose on earth will be loosed in heaven" (Mt 16:18-19).
This community of faith is expressed, among other things, in the
figures of saints venerated by both Polish and German Catholics. I am thinking of Saint Brun von Querfurt,
Saint Hedwig of Silesia, Saint Teresia Benedicta of the Cross (Edith Stein) or
Saint Maximilian Maria Kolbe. Of
particular importance in our relations is also the exchange of letters on
forgiveness, which marked the beginning of an important and urgently needed
process of reconciliation after the difficult experiences of the Second World
War. This process was supported by both
Karol Wojtyła and Blessed Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński. In later years, it found concrete expression
in the spiritual and material support we received from German Catholics during
the period of communism in our homeland.
For all these reasons, the Catholic Church in Germany is very
close to me and very important. In view
of this communion of faith and history between Poland and Germany, I would like
to express my deep concern about the information that has recently been heard
from certain circles of the Catholic Church in Germany. Therefore, in the spirit of Christian
charity, allow me to address this letter to you - as the President of the
German Bishops' Conference - full of brotherly concern, in the spirit of common
responsibility for the good of the Holy Apostolic faith entrusted to us by
Christ.
As shepherds of the Church, we are aware that a spiritual battle
is being waged in the world. "For
we have to fight not against men of flesh and blood, but against powers and
authorities, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the evil
spirits in the heavenly realms" (Eph 6:12). Christ has won the victory over Satan, and it
is the task of the Church to make this victory a reality in the world. Allow me, dear brother in the episcopate, to
share my concern about the validity of the theses put forward by some circles
of the Catholic Church in Germany, especially in connection with the so-called
"Synodal Path".
The temptation to seek the fullness of truth outside the Gospel.
The Catholic Church in Germany is important on the map of
Europe, and I am aware that it will radiate either its faith or its unbelief
throughout the continent. That is why I
view with concern the approach of the German "Synodal Path" so far. Looking at its fruits, one can get the
impression that the basis of reflection is not always the Gospel. This has happened again and again throughout
history. Consider the so-called
Jefferson Bible (T. Jefferson, The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth, Rough
Draft Printing 2015). The American
president claimed that the Gospels contained sentences that were very wise and
lofty, certainly coming directly from Jesus, but also sentences that were
foolish and trivial, so that they must have come from uneducated apostles. Convinced that he had the criteria to
distinguish one sentence from another, he decided to do so with scissors. In this way, a modern apocryphal text was
created which, according to its author, was better than the original. It cannot be ruled out that it was precisely
in these challenging fragments of the Bible that fell under the "Jefferson
scissors" that the proprium christianum - that which is unique to
Christianity alone - was expressed.
The temptation to believe in the infallibility of the social sciences.
One of the temptations in the Church today is to constantly
confront the teachings of Jesus with current developments in psychology and the
social sciences. When something in the
Gospel does not agree with the current state of knowledge in these sciences,
disciples try to "update" the Gospel to protect the Master from being
compromised in the eyes of his contemporaries.
The temptation to "modernise" particularly concerns the area
of sexual identity. However, it is
forgotten that the state of scientific knowledge often changes, sometimes
dramatically, e.g. due to paradigm shifts.
Changeability is in the nature of science, which has only a fraction of
the total possible knowledge at its disposal.
The discovery of errors and their analysis is the engine of scientific
progress.
However, some scientific mistakes had dramatic consequences. One need only mention scientific theories
such as racism or eugenics. Based on the
latest scientific findings, the US Congress passed the National Origin Act in
1924, which imposed restrictive immigration quotas on southern and central
Europeans and almost completely banned immigration from Asia. The main reason was the belief that peoples
like Italians and Poles were racially inferior.
On the other hand, an estimated 70,000 women belonging to ethnic
minorities were forcibly sterilised in the 20th century in the United States on
the basis of the findings of eugenics (cf. G. Consolmagno, Covid, fede e
fallibilità della scienza, La Civiltà Cattolica 4118, pp. 105-119). In this and other cases, one speaks of
so-called "scientific errors".
In addition, however, there are also "ideological fallacies". These underlie, for example, the change in
attitudes to sexuality that can currently be observed (J. A. Reisman, E. W.
Eichel, Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People, Huntington House
Publication, Lafayette 1990; J. Colapinto, As Nature Made Him. The Boy Who Was Raised As a Girl, Harper
Perennial, New York-London-Toronto-Sydney 2006).
The process of knowledge development does not stop with our
generation. The generations that come
after us will have to put aside some of the books, such as those on psychology
or social sciences, which are now considered almost infallible. So how should the Church respond to the
current state of scientific knowledge so as not to repeat the mistake it made
with regard to Galileo Galilei? This is
a serious intellectual challenge that we must face by drawing on revelation and
the solid achievements of science.
The temptation to live with an inferiority complex.
I am aware that today's Catholics - not only in Germany but also
in Poland - live under the pressure of public opinion, which creates a kind of
inferiority complex in many of them. The
disciples of Christ in general, Pope Francis wrote, are today threatened by a kind
of inferiority complex "which leads them to relativise or hide their
Christian identity and convictions. (...)
Finally, they stifle the joy of mission in a kind of obsession to be like
everyone else and to have what everyone else has" (Evangelii gaudium, 79).
Pope Francis, in an address to the staff of the Roman Curia,
stressed that we no longer live in a "Christian system" in Europe
today (Francis, Address to the Roman Curia on the Occasion of the Christmas
Wish, 21 December 2019). The world has
become more pluralistic in many ways. An
important cause of this change in the Old Continent is "a profound crisis
of faith which has afflicted many people".
Faith "no longer constitutes a self-evident condition of common
life, but is often even denied, ridiculed, marginalised and ridiculed". Unfortunately, "the god of this age has
blinded the minds of unbelievers" (2 Cor 4:4). They do not endure sound doctrine but seek
teachers according to their own lusts (cf. 2 Tim 4:3). Therefore the warning addressed to the Romans
is justified: "And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed
by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove and discern what is the will
of God: that which is good, and acceptable, and perfect!" (Rom 12:2).
True to the teaching of the Church, we must not give in to the
pressures of the world or the models of the prevailing culture, as this can
lead to moral and spiritual corruption. Let
us avoid repeating hackneyed slogans and standard demands such as the abolition
of celibacy, the priesthood of women, communion for remarried divorcees or the
blessing of same-sex partnerships. "Updating"
the definition of marriage in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is no reason
to tamper with the gospel.
The temptation of corporate thinking
I know that the Church in Germany is losing more and more
believers and that the number of priests is decreasing year by year. It is therefore looking for ways to keep the
faithful in line and to encourage young people to choose the priesthood. In doing so, however, it seems to be exposing
itself to the danger of corporate thinking: "There is a shortage of
personnel, we should lower the recruitment criteria". Therefore, the postulate of lifting the
obligation of priestly celibacy was included in the text "Promise of
celibacy in the service of the priest", which had its first reading on 4
February this year at the meeting of the "Synodal Path" in Frankfurt
am Main.
The answer to the question of the relationship between the
requirement of priestly celibacy and the number of vocations has already been
given by Pope Paul VI: "We are not inclined to believe that the abolition
of ecclesiastical celibacy would immediately cause a significant increase in
the number of vocations to the priesthood.
The current practice of the Churches and other religious communities
which allow their clergy to marry seems to prove the opposite"
(Sacerdotalis celibatus, 49).
The causes of the crisis lie elsewhere. We clergy have often become mere experts on
social, migration and environmental policies, which certainly does not require
a celibate life. But Christ, as Pope
Francis points out, does not need clergy who are obsessively preoccupied with
their free time and "feel an urgent need to preserve their freedoms, as if
an evangelising mission were a dangerous poison rather than a joyful response
to the love of God who calls us to mission" (Evangelii gaudium, 81). The faithful deserve priests who place
themselves entirely at the service of Christ.
Christ calls his disciples to "be with him" (Mk 3:14). What draws people to the Church and to the
priesthood is not another offer of an easy life, but the example of a life
totally consecrated to God.
In this context, the German "Synodal journey" also
took up the question of women's ordination and voted on the text "Women in
Ministries and Offices in the Church" on 4 February in Frankfurt am Main. John Paul II finally settled this question. "In order, therefore, that any doubt may
be removed concerning the important matter which concerns the divine
constitution of the Church itself, I declare, by virtue of my office of
strengthening the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32), that the Church has no authority
whatsoever to ordain women to the priesthood, and that all the faithful of the
Church must definitively abide by this decision" (John Paul II, Ordinatio
Sacerdotalis, 4).
Pope Francis has already reminded us of this on several
occasions: "And as far as the ordination of women is concerned, the Church
has spoken out and said: 'No'. John Paul
II said it definitively. This gate is
closed, but on this matter I want to tell you something. I have already said it, but I repeat it. Our Lady, Mary, was more important than the
apostles, bishops, deacons and priests. A
woman in the Church is more important than bishops and priests" (Francis,
press conference on flight from Rio de Janeiro to Rome, 28.07.2013).
In the modern world, equality is often misunderstood and equated
with uniformity. Any difference is
treated as a sign of discrimination. Moreover,
the priesthood is sometimes misunderstood as a source of domination and
ecclesiastical career rather than humble service. John Paul II, in his teaching on the
Sacrament of Holy Orders reserved for men, invoked the will of Christ and
Tradition, referring to what he called the "complementarity of the
sexes". Women played a very
important role in the life of Jesus, besides James and John there are also Mary
and Martha. They were the first
witnesses of the resurrection. Finally,
we have the Blessed Virgin Mary, without whose consent the mystery of the
Incarnation would not have taken place and from whom Jesus learned to be human. Although Christ violated the rules accepted
in Jewish society for the relationship between man and woman, as in his
conversation with the Samaritan woman, he did not leave the slightest doubt
that the priesthood was a vocation exclusively for men (cf. Mulieris
dignitatem, 26; Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, 2). However, this did not prevent women from
playing an equally important, sometimes perhaps even more important role in the
Church than men. The list of female
saints who have significantly influenced the destiny of the Church is long. They include Saint Hildegard of Bingen, Saint
Catherine of Siena, Saint Hedwig, Queen of Poland, Saint Teresa of Avila and
Saint Faustina.
In addition, in one of the four forums of the "Synodal
journey", a working document "Living in Successful
Relationships" was voted on, which promotes the erroneous and scandalous
practice of blessing same-sex partnerships and attempts to change the Church's
teaching on the sin of homosexual acts.
The Catechism clearly distinguishes between homosexual
inclinations and homosexual acts. It
teaches respect for every person regardless of inclination, but clearly
condemns homosexual acts as contrary to nature (cf. Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:9-10).
Despite outrage, ostracism and unpopularity, the Catholic
Church, faithful to the truth of the Gospel and at the same time driven by love
for every human being, cannot remain silent and agree with this false image of
humanity, let alone bless or promote it.
The inadmissibility of blessing same-sex couples was recalled by
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in its letter of 22 February
2021: "To be consistent with the nature of the sacramentals, it is therefore
necessary that, when a blessing is invoked upon some human relationships, apart
from the right intention of those who participate in it, the reality to be
blessed is objectively and positively ordered to receive and express grace, in
the service of God's plans inscribed in creation and fully revealed by Christ
the Lord. Therefore, only that which is in itself ordered to serve these plans
is compatible with the nature of the blessing given by the Church. For this reason, it is not permissible to
confer a blessing on relationships or even stable partnerships that involve
sexual practice outside of marriage (that is, outside of an indissoluble union
of a man and a woman that is in itself open to the transmission of life), as is
the case with unions of persons of the same sex" (Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Responsum ad dubium of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith on the Blessing of Unions of Persons of the Same Sex).
The temptation to bow to pressure.
The present crisis of the Church in Europe is above all a crisis
of faith. In order to speak about God,
we must first speak to God who lives in the depths of our hearts where we taste
the truth (R. Sarah, Serving the Truth, Wydawnictwo Sióstr Loretanek, Warszawa
2021, p. 148). The crisis of faith is
one of the reasons why the Church has difficulties in proclaiming clear
theological and moral teaching.
The authority of the Pope and the Bishops is most needed when
the Church is going through a difficult time and when it is under pressure to
deviate from the teachings of Jesus. When
it experiences similar dramas as the Christians in Galatia. She needs to say this emphatically:
"There is no other gospel, there are only some people who confuse you and
who want to distort the gospel of Christ" (Gal 1:7).
Pope Paul VI, under pressure for his position on contraception
expressed in the encyclical Humanae vitae, wrote: "Should the moral law be
lowered to the level of what people habitually do, thus reducing morality to
the level of custom (which, by the way, may be even worse tomorrow than it is
today, and where will we end up then)? Or,
on the contrary, is it necessary to maintain a high level of the ideal, even if
it is difficult to achieve, even if the ordinary person feels unable or guilty
to achieve it? I think that along with
all sages, heroes and saints, I would say: All true friends of human nature and
true human happiness (believers and unbelievers), even if they protest and
resist, will give thanks in their hearts to the authority that has enough
light, strength and confidence not to lower the ideal. Neither the prophets of Israel nor the
apostles of the Church ever set out to lower the ideal, nor did they soften the
concept of perfection, nor did they try to narrow the gap between the ideal and
nature. They never restricted the
concept of sin - quite the contrary" (Paul VI, in: J. Guitton, Dialogues
with Paul VI, Poznań 1969, p. 296).
Similarly, Pope Francis wrote:
"Since the faith is one, it must be confessed in all its purity and
integrity. Precisely because all the
articles of faith are bound together in unity, to deny any one of them, even
those that seem less important, is to harm the whole, as it were. Every epoch experiences that individual
aspects of the faith can be accepted more easily or with greater difficulty:
Therefore it is important to be vigilant so that the whole deposit of faith is
passed on (cf. 1 Tim 6:20), so that all aspects of the confession of faith are
insisted upon in an appropriate manner. Inasmuch
as the unity of the faith is the unity of the Church, to take something away
from the faith is in fact to take something away from the truth of
communion" (Lumen fidei, 48).
Dear Brother in the episcopate, our
attitude towards the world cannot be fundamentally negative, for Christ did not
come into the world to judge the world, but to save the world (cf. Jn 12:47). God does not want the sinner to die, but to
repent and live (cf. Ez 33:11). Our task
is to find effective ways to make people repent. Therein also lies the mercy of God. When Jesus saw the crowds, he had compassion
on them, "for they were like sheep without a shepherd. And he taught them for a long time" (Mk
6:34). This sentence does not mean that
there were no shepherds in Israel at that time who were entrusted with the care
of God's sheepfold. However, there was a
serious danger that if the shepherds failed, God's people, i.e. those who
belong to God, would be scattered and many sheep would be lost or fall prey to
predators.
I know - we have spoken about
this in our meetings, also recently in Poznan - that you care about the fate of
the sheepfold entrusted to you and that you desire that none of the sheep go
astray, that each of the believers entrusted to you attain eternal life with
Christ. So let me conclude with the
words that are found at the beginning of Paul's letter to the Ephesians:
"Finally, become strong through the power and might of the Lord. Put on the armour of God to resist the wiles
of the devil. For we have to fight not
against men of flesh and blood, but against powers and authorities, against the
world rulers of this darkness, against the evil spirits in the heavenly realms. Therefore, put on the armour of God, that you
may be able to withstand in the day of calamity, to accomplish all things and to
stand firm! Stand therefore, your hips
girded with truth, clothed in the breastplate of righteousness, your feet shod
with readiness for the gospel of peace. Above
all, take up the shield of faith! With
it you can extinguish all the fiery projectiles of evil. And take the helmet of salvation and the
sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God!
Do not cease from prayer and supplication! Pray at all times in the Spirit; be watchful,
persevere, and pray for all the saints, even for me, that the right word may be
given me, as often as I open my mouth to proclaim with boldness the mystery of
the gospel; as its messenger I am in chains, that in it I may speak freely, as
is my duty" (Eph 6:10-20).
With distinguished esteem and
fraternal greetings in Christ,
+ Stanisław Gądecki
Archbishop Metropolitan of
Poznan
President of the Polish Bishops'
Conference
Warsaw, 22 February 2022
On the Feast of Saint Peter’s
Chair
Polish Catholic Action have made their views firmly felt more recently.
This upset the Germans
See also original report.
Comments